Catholic revenge porn brings out the prudes

Valerie Dodds is officially my favorite person of the day. When her classmates at her Catholic high school learned that she wanted to become a porn star after graduation, they did exactly what you would expect a bunch of uptight Catholic god-humpers to do–slut shaming. So what did she do? Well, once she graduated high school she became a porn star and went back to her old school to shoot a little revenge porn. Boo yah! There are a few pictures of it floating around. This one (NSFW) is my favorite. Porn-posing over a Bible verse that says “all things IN Christ”? Check. Putting her pussy right above the “things” just in case the suggestion was too subtle? Check. Making a gagging gesture to indicate what having sex with Christ would induce? Check, check, check. Pure, unadulterated awesomeness.

But of course, this is the internet age. If a woman does something sexual to protest her peers’ slut-shaming her, we all know what happens next. More people come out of the woodwork to slut shame her. The comments sections of several articles on the topic are riddled with it. For example

sarahelizabeth24 hours ago
What the heck is wrong with her eyebrows in the first picture??The better question is…what the heck is wrong with her MIND to expect people NOT to mock her dream?? ESPECIALLY at a CATHOLIC SCHOOL??I certainly hope that the pictures end up being forcibly removed. This school does not deserve to have its name associated with such trash.

Oh, the Catholic Church deserves much fucking worse than this. How many priests do you think see that picture and immediately think, “If only she were an alter boy”?

Janeben20 hours ago
She’s a disrespectful piece of jailbait.

She’s 19. Do you even fucking know what “jailbait” means?

yesman61 day ago
They’re leaving out the part that about a year earlier she wrongly accused another student of sexual assault because she got caught sneaking out, costing the student and their parents around $20k to prove his innocence. This girl is a disease to society, especially Lincoln.

Big shocker: YESMAN6 provides exactly zero evidence to back up this allegation.

td231 day ago
What does she think she really accomplished? I am sure most of them, aside from the faculty, probably all looked at the photos and felt sorry for how screwed up this kid really is. The only person she embarrassed was herself. I have no problem with what she did from a personal perspective but have to sit here and laugh with her thinking she got the last laugh. Mostly everyone there was probably laughing at what a fool she’s made out of herself.

He has no problem with it. He just thinks any woman who does porn must be screwed up, embarrassing herself, and a fool. Because, as we all know, a woman who does something sexual does it because there’s something wrong with her, not because she’s an adult who can make her own choices and express her sexuality however she wants (so long as it’s consensual).

Bklyn Diamond1 day ago
And this is the result of raising a me me me generation that has no thought outside of the instant gratification of themselves.No sense of caring for others, no sense of respect of others at all.

Ah, another member of the We’re Better Than Everyone Else generation. How the fuck did their parents raise them that they ended up being so self-righteous? And is there any way we could get a time machine and go back and fish-slap each and every one of them until they promise not to raise a generation of sanctimonious twats?

ArmyTx1 day ago
All looks no brains.

Pretty girls are dumb! What an astute observation!

I think this “attractive people are dumb” twaddle stems from the fact that people need to think that people who are better than them in one area must be worse than them in some other. A guy with an expensive car must have a small penis. A girl who is very sexually free must have had a shitty childhood. Etc. Etc. Etc.

mikebythesea1 day ago
People have “dreams” of going into “adult entertainment”? And aren’t the names she was called at least in the ballpark given her ambitions? We’re not talking about one of the nuns being falsely labeled here.

There’s a slut-shaming ballpark? Did this happen when Rush Limbaugh was at ESPN?

Rok1 day ago
Way to prove them wrong… ur, uhm, right. Where are morals, values and sound decision making? Revenge? What is she, 13? Does she truly think the school feels any different about her? Lord in Heaven give this woman direction… besides being used as a depot.

Kinda like how this supposed Lord in Heaven used the Virgin Mary?

RCBQ81 day ago
At least she is getting paid for it now….I’m sure high school was freebies.

She’s a slut! Amiright amiright amiright!

Rok1 day ago
So… if that was your daughter? You’d have no problem? You’d say… ‘Good for you kiddo!! You’re beautiful and I hope you are the best porn star ever!!! I can’t wait until I see one of your movies!!’ SMH… it’s wrong… it promotes infidelity and promiscuity. Porn many times lands in the hands of children who have no business seeing it. It drives many without the ability to control their impulses to sexual depravity. Get it for real, honor your wife and women. Honor yourself and God. Be a man, an adult and have some self-discipline and control.

Some people really don’t have a problem with their kids doing porn, so long as they do it safely and consensually. But a lack of desire to judge others and control other people’s sex lives is just completely fucking incomprehensible to some of the shit-for-brains out there.

lexie161 day ago
Porn also promotes sex trafficking and slavery.

Except for that whole inconvenient part where it does no such thing at all.

RockawayBob1 day ago
She thinks she is shaming her former classmates and school. She is shaming herself and her family but she is too foolish to realize it. What a disgrace!
lexie161 day ago
She’s ruining her future. If she changes her mind about her ambitions she will never be able to get away from this.

This is one of the most infuriating things about bigots. They shame people for being gay or for being “sluts”, and then they say “It’s bad to be gay/a slut because people will shame you for it!”

Yes, people might shame her for doing porn. But not if you people don’t stop being such slut-shaming sexist bigoted pieces of dog shit. Stop creating a problem and then pointing to it as a reason that you should keep creating problems.

AshleighF1 day ago
No stable teenage girl “dreams” of doing porn.Her classmates must have just been calling it like they saw it.
sarahelizabeth24 hours ago
Well, judging by the fact that she dangled naked in front of the motto of a CATHOLIC school, I would say lack of stability is definitely a possibility.

Another classic bigot chestnut: “You don’t think like me, therefore there must be something wrong with you.”

What really irritates me is that these are two women making these sexist remarks. Keep putting yourselves down, girls. It’s just what the men on the right wing want you to do. It’s easier for them to repress you if you do all the work yourselves.

Tio Tony1 day ago
Aspiring (love that word). Gonna get revenge, typical woman.

Men never get revenge. Ever. It’s just those dirty cunts who get revenge. It’s not like there’s an entire genre of action movies about men who get revenge or anything. Nope. Rambo was a lady. A big, muscley, deep-voice, be-facial-haired lady. Yup.

Fucking idiot.

mick73641 day ago
A female teen porn star, got to love the new women of America, thank you liberal America.

I do love the new women of America. They don’t let judgmental donkeyfuckers like you tell them what they can do with their own bodies.

olleb1 day ago
ja ja ja ! She is panning to go do the same in front of the court house, That looks like fun to her, Ohhh My God, this is America’s future!
Some kids want respect with a gun in hand,others prefer to sell drugs, girls prefer to have kids and join the welfare system, But just a few smart ones go for education, Look at this stupid 19 year old, she has the chance to hang a diploma on her wall, but she choose to hang dildoessss!
and this is the start……..!

How many diplomas do you think are on this genius’ wall?

east new york1 day ago
she’s a cutie, so stop.
I told you interracial porn is BIG, and the internet has
made this a hundreds of million dollar industry.
lock ya daughters up, she could be next and
this could be her dream too.

Wait. What? Uh… Is racism just attracted to sexism by some kind of asshole magnetism? Because the issue here has nothing to do with race.

Well, anyways, I’m done here. I think I’m gonna go make fun of that girl and see if she’ll do a show at my place next.

Kidding, of course. 😉

Naked Naughty “Nuns” get sued

This is the kind of headline that grabs one’s attention:

Catholic group to sue naked feminist protesters

I saw that Neil Gaimon had tweeted it from Joe. My. God. and had to check it out. So, what’s going on here?

Catholic group Civitas is suing the group Femen for “sexual exhibitionism” in front of children, as well as protesting illegally and insulting a religious group by mocking their appearance.

So what is this “sexual exhibitionism” that so scarred these poor children?  Well, the protesting women’s boobs were, like, visible and stuff. (Image NSFW) They weren’t even properly naked, just topless. I generally demand more from my sexual exhibitionism. They could at least have made out or something. Maybe a little fisting. Just a little.

This is in France, by the way. This Catholic group is suing for showing boobage in France. Seriously, who doesn’t show their boobs in France? I’ve seen a French film or two. I seriously thought boobs were so common in France that people barely noticed them. “Hey, Jacques. You ever notice how hard it is to see the futbol game with all these boobs in the way?” “What boobs?”

And “insulting a religious group by mocking their appearance”? Is that really illegal in France? Insulting people should never be illegal. Religious people need to learn that the law is not your bah-bah that you can suck on whenever you get your feelings hurt and feel all poopy inside. And let’s keep in mind–these naked feminist nuns were counter-protesting a Catholic run anti-gay march. So it’s okay for the Catholics to march to deny gays equal rights, but it’s not okay to make fun of the Catholics’ silly costumes. Christian privilege, much? Oh, and fuck boobies. Children might see them. And we all know how scarring that would be if a boob were visible and a child saw it. It might do horrible things to him, like make him giggle for a few seconds. Oh, the humanity.

So who is this lesbian feminist group? From what I can gather at Le Monde (my French is rusty), they’re a rather outlandish women’s rights group that has drawn quite a bit of controversy for their over the top protests which they always do topless. This has led to the legitimate question of whether they are actually conveying a message or if people just see the breasts and forget everything else. European feminists worry that if Femen becomes the face (or chest) of feminism it could distract people from the message, and maybe that’s true. Honestly, in my opinion, while I’m all for feminism and gay rights and lots of other left wing issues, I’ve never participated in a protest of any kind and probably never will. It’s just too herd-mentality for me. But I support other people’s right to do it, even in the nude. So long as they don’t get violent…but we’ll get to that in a moment.

The feminist protesters turned up to the march against the proposed marriage for all law wearing only knickers and stockings, and with graffiti criticising the march written on their bodies.

I’m not sure if I’m comfortable calling gay marriage “marriage for all”. That seems to play right into the dumb ass slippery slope arguments that the right loves to use, where gay marriage will lead to people marrying box turtles and lawn sprinklers. Although maybe this is a translation problem.

Well, anyways, they’re criticizing an anti-gay march. Good for them!

They also fired canisters of tear gas at the marchers.

NOT good for them.  What the hell, girls? Spraying tear gas? That is way out of line.

That is, it’s way out of line if it’s true. I see some reason for doubt. Here’s a YouTube video of the event (NSFW, obviously, because of boobs. People, for some odd reason that I’ll never understand, hate seeing boobs.)

You can definitely see them spraying….something. But is it tear gas, or any kind of dangerous gas? Everyone exposed to it seems to be fine. I don’t see anyone rubbing their eyes or reacting to it in any way. I was at a hockey game a while back when a drunk guy six or seven rows back from me got maced by security. Even though I was several yards away, it irritated my eyes quite a bit. And that was just one guy getting sprayed with a small amount of mace.  In the video, the…whatever it is they spray seems to go everywhere, but people seem to be doing just fine.

One thing that is clear from the video is that they are attacked by the anti-gay protestors.

Some members of the feminist group were attacked and injured by the marchers.

Yeah, I just said that. Try to keep up, article I’m commenting on!

Five people have since been arrested in connection to the violence.

Who were these five people? Were they from Femen or Civitas? What did the police have to say about the allegations of tear gas or that the anti-gay protestors attacked the feminists?

Jesus titty balls, the French media is even worse than American media when it comes to leaving out relevant information. It’s hard to form a well-reasoned opinion on this with such sparse reporting. Who attacked whom first? That’s really important info.

Alain Escada, the president of Civitas, said the catholic group would also be suing Femen for spreading a message in a violent manner, organised violence with arms and threatening the freedom to protest of others.

If they actually did any of those things, you should sue. Why was this story all about the suing for boobs and dressing up in “insulting” costumes if there was the possibility of violence in this protest? Why did this shit come up at the end of the article? It’s definitely the more important stuff. But it’s also the stuff where the information becomes so sparse that the article is mostly useless. Also, I can’t help but notice that the journalist who authored this article has apparently spoken only to members of Civitas, but not Femen. Why weren’t the women asked for a statement on this? Are we following some arcane Catholic rule that only lets the men speak? What the hell?

Of course, I tend towards the naked feminist nuns’ side, since 1.) I agree with gay rights and feminism and 2.) I like boobs. However, if they did really spray tear gas into a crowd, then that’s simply inexcusable behavior and they should be in jail. On the other hand, maybe that was just some kind of harmless smoke bomb they set off, and the Civitas bigots attacked them unprovoked, in which case it’s the bigots who should be in jail. Or maybe it really was tear gas or mace, but they only sprayed it in self defense after someone attacked them. It would be nice if the article provided enough information to resolve this issue, but the stuff I quoted is all we get.

It would also be nice if the article focused on the violence rather than the boobs. As I said, I like me some boobs, but anti-free-speech violence is a much more pressing issue. (I also like pressing boobs.) It makes me think that perhaps the critics of Femen’s method might have a point. Except for the fact that if this story hadn’t involved boobs, the odiousness of Civitas’ protest against gay marriage would not have spread across the world. It’s doubtful that this story would have gotten any attention outside of France if not for the boob angle. So, yay for boobs! I guess.